Quote:They don't have to be. By wilfully remaining members of that corrupt outfit and thus continuing to support it they are enablers.Isn't this a fallacy of guilty by association? what if I don't go to church? does that mean that if I'm a marxist I am responsible by Stalin's policies even if I personally disagree with his take on Marxism?
I think most people made good points - Sometimes being politically correct is not bad - Let's imagine a priest is giving a lecture inside a church and someone goes inside and screams "GOD IS NOT REAL FUCKERS!" - That's not necessarily wrong or illegal, but it's annoying and incorrect as fuck because people are just having a good time inside a place specifically made available for believers.
Free speech is great, but it doesn't mean freedom from the consequences of your words - You can say whatever you want, but you don't have the right to enter my house just to say what you want, and I don't need to give you a megaphone to help highlight your words. If I'm the owner of some place (let's say it's a bar) and a white supremacist wants to give a speech, I can refuse it and I don't think it matters if it is politically incorrect.
The truth is that, to some extent, people consider politically correct whatever they don't like and can't criticize (at least without any drawback) - Just like indoctrination. When you agree with something, suddenly it stops being indoctrination and becomes a normal teaching, right?
Whoever fights monsters should see to it that in the process he does not become a monster. And if you gaze long enough into an abyss, the abyss will gaze back into you
