(June 27, 2015 at 10:48 pm)Lek Wrote:(June 27, 2015 at 10:25 pm)Parkers Tan Wrote: So do you agree that polygamy should be permissible? That was a definition of marriage two thousand years ago.
You Christians have changed the definition of marriage already. Why are you complaining about that now, if not to defend your bigotry?
No. The United States never recognized polygamy. When our country was founded and the constitution was put into law,marriage was accepted as a union between and man and a woman. If another country was founded accepting polygamy, that's their business. They should apply whatever legal status is warranted.
Nonsense. You wrote earlier in this thread that she laws banning interracial marriage were struck down, that was a changed definition.
Additionally, your reply completely ignores my point that Christians have yourself changed the definitions of marriage. Answering in regards to American jurisprudence is dodging my question, so I will ask it again: Given that you Christians have changed the definition of marriage over the centuries, what is the basis of your complaint that this ruling changes the definition of marriage, if it's not a defense of the bigotry?