MARRIAGE EQUALITY NATIONWIDE

[Mr.wizard]

The decision wasn't what I was pointing at. The definition of marriage as a fundamental right, one that is guaranteed by the 14th amendment, is what I was pointing at. If you agree that even with his definition of marriage he was right, now you have to provide a reason that two men don't qualify for equal protection and due process under the law, and why this fundamental right becomes exclusionary.

I keep stating over and over that I believe equal rights should be given to all.  That's why I suggested a legal civil union which applies to all Americans, straight or gay, who enter into that contract.  Marriage would be a private matter.  In that way, government would not be redefining an institution that is so important to so many citizens, yet it would confer equal status and benefits under the law to all who qualify.  What is so terrible about that?  Marriage came about long before any government was involved.

I don't understand what you are saying, what do you mean marriage would be a private matter? Marriage can be a private matter without government involvement, it just wont be recognized by the state or federal government so you or your spouse wouldn't be entitled to the legal benefits. The government is involved with marriage for legal reasons regarding taxes, beneficiaries, children, and property assets, which are huge reasons why gay couples where seeking legally recognized marriages. There is nothing sacred about marriage is nothing more than a legal contract, I don't know why you are worried about definitions. Also, why do you think anyone else's marriage will be changed at all now that gays can get married.