Now what?

[Cato]

Do you think the supremecourt decision would have been null and void if they used the term 'civial union' over marriage?

I understand that it's difficult for you, but please try to keep up. Had legislatures influenced by the religious right permitted civil unions that provided the same legal benefits of marriage, there would have been no basis for a 14th amendment equal protection case. The fact is that many did not and the result was last week's decision. Screaming for civil unions now is laughable; kind of like treating decapitation with a bandage.

Citation?
I couldn't find anything.. matter of fact I found that there is a 600 yearold example of gay civial unions which the church did not cosponsor.

Are you seriously making an attempt to disavow the religious right's influence in the Ohio style legislation prohibiting civil unions?

What are you talking about? I wasn't till the last 20 years that supposed Christians have not taken marriage seriously.

Even then we still fair better than most.

Bullshit:

Actually I did infact research everything I say as well as what you say sport, and can not find anything to support anything you said here off your cuff. Maybe regoup and try again. This time take the time to check the crap you try and sell with google first. Because I will, and force feed it back to you if it does not fly.

Looks like your research skills require an upgrade.