(July 6, 2015 at 4:47 pm)Huggy74 Wrote: How do you draw that conclusion from my last post?
I'm talking about the thread where atheist's were defending an adult male having sex with an underage boy. Which do you think is worse? the boy or the dog?
It seems like the guy in the op was attempting to defend "pedos" himself.... he'd be right at home here.
oh. I thought, in light of recent events, you were referring to the slippery slope argument
I think they're not comparable in this way. I also think we've established the guy was not, by definition, a pedophile, and that that was the issue the posters took in that thread. please don't quote it and derail this thread, let's keep the discussion on topic
