(July 6, 2015 at 4:47 pm)Huggy74 Wrote: How do you draw that conclusion from my last post?
I'm talking about the thread where atheist's were defending an adult male having sex with an underage boy. Which do you think is worse? the boy or the dog?
It seems like the guy in the op was attempting to defend "pedos" himself.... he'd be right at home here.It seems to be a subject you're well versed in...
Thankfully we don't have to work with a "tier system" of different levels of sin, we can comfortably describe both of those activities as "weird perverted shit".
I actually don't think a pedo apologist would be out of place here; considering Mormons have to defend Joe Smith's underage wives, Muslims nine year old wife of Muhammad etc etc.