RE: LISTEN, CHRISTIANS!
July 14, 2015 at 12:41 am
(This post was last modified: July 14, 2015 at 12:42 am by Huggy Bear.)
(July 14, 2015 at 12:33 am)KevinM1 Wrote:(July 14, 2015 at 12:20 am)Huggy74 Wrote: If you're going to be against atrocities than be against ALL atrocities. What makes you a hypocrite is being selective. Science is your God / Absolute, yet we won't hear a peep from you about atrocities committed in the name of science.
Please point me to someone denying terrible shit has been done in the name of science. Then please explain how us not providing a "but, terrible shit has also happened in connection with X" caveat in our posts is somehow us implicitly condoning that terrible shit. Or how our forum membership - which you know nothing about because, shocker, people don't use the same names everywhere they go - paints an accurate picture of our motivations.
Go ahead, I'll wait.
Still don't get it? I already gave you an example of "vicarious redemption" which you atheist's claim is immoral, yet you benefit off of medicines based off the very concept of another creature being sacrifice in your place in order for you to live...
So you see, if you utilize medicine, then you really don't honestly believe it is immoral then, do you?
(July 14, 2015 at 12:38 am)Esquilax Wrote: And again, the question remains: why are you assuming we're not against other atrocities just because we don't keep a comprehensive tome of arguments against them all? Why is specific interest in one wide ranging topic hypocritical in that case, especially since there's more to theological discussion than merely the atrocities?
Ah, who am I kidding? You don't have the answers to any of those questions, because you're not really thinking about the arguments that prompted them. You're just slinging shit to see what sticks, again.
see above.