LISTEN, CHRISTIANS!

[Rhondazvous]

Wished I had gotten here earlier in the thread, sorry fellow Christians. Like I just said to Rhondazvous, there are many here that are mad at God and many of the Christians who were here in the past have said so also. Just because those atheist deny they are not mad at God they can't hide their real feelings, at some time or other they will show their true self. One doesn't have to come out and say they are mad and an atheist wouldn't because the others would be all over that person for claiming to be an atheist, so atheist are very careful not to say such a thing, they can't stand having the truth told, so denial is their only way out.

Min, Esq, Cin, Nei and many others, all that one needs to do is read with attention and see they are mad at God and His people, actually the better word here for what they do is hate, it's what Christ said of them.

GC

Yes, in my brief time here among Atheists, I have learned that there are three rules that all Atheists must follow:

1. If you believe that God does not exist, never make a positive claim to that effect. If you do, you will be asked for proof of your claim.
   
2. If you are angry at God, never admit it. If you do, you will be asked how you can be angry at something that does not exist.
   
3. If you are presented with evidence for the existence of God, never acknowledge it as such. You must insist that NO evidence exists, because evidence you do not accept is still evidence, and acknowledging its existence undermines the party line.
   

Newbies learn quickly not to make these mistakes twice.

Didn't he just say he wasn't going to discuss this further? Can't keep a promise for an hour.

1. If I say god doesn't exist, that's not a positive statement and does not need to be proven. It's you who say god does exist who are making the positive statement.
2. Your pigheaded insistence that we are mad at god is disingenuous because you have an agenda for this insistence.
3. What evidence have you presented for the existence of god? If god existed it wouldn't be up to you to present evidence. You approach the phenomenal world with the paradigm that god exist and interpret everything you find according to that paradigm, then take said interpretation as evidence of your paradigm. Let god present his own evidence in a way that cannot be interpreted as anything other than his existence.