(July 14, 2015 at 2:50 pm)Esquilax Wrote:(July 14, 2015 at 1:27 pm)Huggy74 Wrote: Are you saying a cure doesn't free from what distresses or harms?
Are you saying a cure doesn't extricate from or help to overcome something detrimental?
Are you saying a cure doesn't offset the bad effect of?
A cure is indeed redemption because it is meant to restore you back to health. Just as Jesus' sacrifice was to restore man back to what he originally was in the beginning.
Are you just not reading my posts before you disagree with them? Come back when you actually understand why we object to the Jesus narrative's vicarious redemption, because I don't have the time for someone who refuses to know what he's talking about, but still thinks he has some informed position from which to disagree. The objection to the Jesus redemption is not present in the medical one; if you're intent on just playing definition games to attempt to win points then I'll just use your terminology. It doesn't get you any closer to being right, anyway.
"Driving," is not the objectionable part of "drunk driving," and "redemption" is not at issue in this discussion, if we're to go along with your definitions.
He doesn't have to read your posts to know you're wrong, Esq. He decided that a long time ago.
Thief and assassin for hire. Member in good standing of the Rogues Guild.
