(July 18, 2015 at 12:08 pm)Esquilax Wrote:(July 18, 2015 at 1:05 am)Huggy74 Wrote: you know, that used to be in my sig till it was permanently disabled... gee I wonder why?
Interesting how you still edit out the immediate next post from Rhythm where he admits his mistake and moves on, and then have the gall to act all injured and innocent, wondering why we put a stop to your little quote mines.
Incidentally, what you say here is a lie, which you still say nobody can ever provide an example of here, because Rhythm's quote wasn't in your sig at the time we took action. No, the record clearly shows that you'd put another blatantly dishonest quote mine in your sig at that point, from FaF, and it became clear then that you were just going to make a habit out of breaking forum rules in your sig.
Oh, I suppose "gee, I wonder why?" is another lie, because you've had this explained to you very recently, in fact. But nobody can provide an example of you acting dishonestly, right?
Oh please... it was you who claimed my sig was never banned in the first place
Also you complained about the rhythm sig on more than one occasion, the FaF sig was just a convenient excuse. You're more than welcome to demonstrate how I took faf's quote out of context, which still isn't against the rules since it explicitly states you can quote PART of someones post, nowhere does it state you must include posts that are made after the fact.
Nevertheless you claiming that faf was taken out of context is an outright lie.
