(July 18, 2015 at 3:29 pm)Esquilax Wrote: The rest of the exchange is the context, regardless of whether it was part of one single post or not. What the hell would context be, to you, if it isn't the rest of the discussion in which a particular exchange took place? The hair you're splitting here is completely ridiculous: under your logic, if someone made one statement and then clarified it in a later post, you could still quote the first post as though it were the poster's actual position, even though the rest of his posts demonstrates that it isn't, and still not be taking his words out of context. What use does a quote mining rule have, if you can extract specific words from someone's posting history, absent of context, to make them say something they never said, without breaking it?
And as I have shown on MULTIPLE occasions that FaF never clarified anything he just went from one wrong answer to another. like I said, you're more than welcome to provide proof to what you're saying, or would you like me to do it?
