RE: Try God...
July 26, 2013 at 10:28 am
(This post was last modified: July 26, 2013 at 10:40 am by ronedee.)
(July 25, 2013 at 4:08 pm)Mister Agenda Wrote:(July 24, 2013 at 5:23 pm)ronedee Wrote: Are you kidding me? You have more flavours of atheism around here than Baskin & Robbins!
LOL, all you were asked to do was find a single atheist claiming what you said we claim. One! You're hilariously evasive.
How about every "supposed" Atheist? Don't you even know what you are?
Webster: Definition of ATHEISM
1archaic : ungodliness, wickedness
2a : a [disbelief in the existence] of deity b : the doctrine that [there is no] deity
---------------------------------
(July 26, 2013 at 7:43 am)Rationalman Wrote: I explained this to rondee just a page back. Did you not read that page? Well, i will say it again:
Atheists do not claim a god does not exist, we claim we do not believe a god exists. Do you see the difference? We are simply reacting to theist claims.
Theists claim that a god does exist. You claim that you know he exists. The burden of proof is on you to prove your extraordinary claim, it is not up to us to try and disprove you.
I would add a stupid example about unicorns or goblins or something but i get the feeling that what i have just said has been repeated to you many times and that you ignore it completely every time
And I'll explain it to you again... Unless you can provide proof of how/what/why the existence of "everything" came to be, there is no basis in saying (true by definition of atheism) there is no God.
If you say: "there might, or may be a God, I have no proof" .....YOU ARE NOT ATHIESTS!
You are in the wrong forum! See you later.
Quis ut Deus?
