RE: Abortion dialogue I've been having...
May 18, 2010 at 5:30 am
(This post was last modified: May 18, 2010 at 5:40 am by Violet.)
(May 18, 2010 at 4:53 am)tackattack Wrote: "Intention is the larger portion by which we should judge actions, after all."
And how does that equate to "one cannot have thoughts of/from/with ____"?
What I said is to imply that intention is more important than the action occurred... as you can hardly punish a girl for leading a man to evil. I should hardly think that amounts to thought police...
KichigaiNeko Wrote:@ Sae ..."should Childbearing and Parenting be an advertised position NO ONE will take the job. Apart form the fact that it is a biological imperative.... see the 'Selfish Gene' for more clarity than I can bring here.
They are actually well-advertised positions... how honestly advertised or 'understood' is questionable, however
The "Selfish Gene" by Dawkins? I think I read that.... 
Not sure anymore... so sleepy ^_^Tacky Wrote:It wasn't my contribution. I was quoting Sae to answer her question about why I thought she was advocatng thought police KichigaiNeko. Sorry I couldn't fuel another tirade against me, Christanity or religion yoou're so fond of and you never answered my PM.
I could fuel one though, if you like?
I can see how one might have argued for thought police in some senses with what I said... but alas: I am far too sensible ^_<
*Saerules practically falls to sleep like a dead tree might fall on a midget if severed at the base*
Please give me a home where cloud buffalo roam
Where the dear and the strangers can play
Where sometimes is heard a discouraging word
But the skies are not stormy all day
