(November 30, 2018 at 2:00 pm)Minimalist Wrote: The problem is you are a fucking idiot with no reading comprehension skills.
Nothing new there, dripshit.
These were independent stories derived from a common source ( known euphemistically as "mark" ) for different audiences in different places at different times. Only a turd jesus freak like you would think that you, with your borderline illiterate ways, could "reconcile" them when the original editors had no such intention.
because you knew what a man 2000 years ago were thinking.. what a douche for even pretending to think you could claim to know of a motivation of a single person 2000 years removed from yourself.
How about this.. in a desperate attempt to try and discredit the bible you all seek out any and all possibilities until one of you douche bags says what if these are independant stories derived from a common source... never mind the 'original source' never mentions the birth of Christ.
Or never mind the idea that if these 4 gospels were all independently telling different stories why oh why didn't 'the church' reconcile all accounts when the bible was first compiled.. or when the bible was put into latin or when latin was only taught and read by the clergy.. why do these stories remain independent when they could have easily be written to conform and all the detail match up like you would like??!?!?
One simple answer explains it all. The gospel accounts are not independent but complementary. they are different in that they show 4 unique writing styles and recorded what was important to the individual, but that's as far as it goes. it is 4 different accounts that cover the same basic thing.
different enough to be uniquely written by different sources but undoubtedly telling the same story.
You guys are stupid in thinking if this were all made up, it would have indeed be changed to exclude errors. look at the koran there are over 1000 changes from the oldest copy to the one currently being read. look at the supplements written to bring the book of mormon up to date, there are two whole books ammending the book of mormon.. and now look at the bible, here we are looking to 2000 year old and older texts to find a more accurate more original telling...
use your head for something other than a dandruff farm minnie, people are not as stupid as you need them to be in order for you to be right! because basicly you are saying in 2000 years no one.. no one saw the mistakes you saw nor saw the potential of being the linchpin in destroying this whole religion, and sought out to change it? That You are the only one who sees this?
Common!
even you can not be that egotistical!
