(April 13, 2011 at 6:37 pm)Statler Waldorf Wrote: Huh? Why would this bother creationists in the slightest? Just because you can synthesis something like this using dozens of carefully controlled factors and intelligently guided forces in no way means it could have ever happened naturally. Sorry to rain on your parade.
Wait. So doing something in a lab is proof that whatever outcome may come is proof that a guiding intelligence must create it and that it would not happen naturally?
Why stop there and carry that line of thought out to its final conclusion. If what you say is true, not only is it proof that such outcomes must have a guiding intelligence, but that guiding intelligence must also be mortal humans.
So tired of half assed arguments from design..they always stop when it seems to fit right with their views, even though you can take the argument a few more steps.
