(February 17, 2012 at 7:22 pm)paintpooper Wrote: It gives states back the right, instead of the federal government creating a law that all states must abide by. It is very simple.
I do not support the Act.
No it doesn't. And no amount of wishful misreads will make that true.
Try fucking reading it for once, specifically paragraph ONE. Paragraph One, sections A and B redefine a motherfucking legal term you dolt.
Jesus fucking christ. Fucking obtuse, that you are.
(February 17, 2012 at 7:29 pm)Tiberius Wrote: I do support the act, and Ron Paul supports it because liberty applies to all humans, including those that are not yet born. It's really as simple as that.
Another thread please, but if not...
Had you ever bothered to learn the slightest iota of human biology, you would know that the 'person' that can be measured (didn't you used to insist on evidence before asserting rights?) in neural activity happens months later, at earliest starting in the second trimester.
For FUCKS SAKE - the neural tube in human development (helps form the spinal column and friends, is the ultra-basic component needed for any brain development) appears three weeks later roughly around Day 23. And THAT is just the tube itself. No infrastructure that would be associated with it (e.g. a brain, etc,.)
How can it be accorded or be protected as a person?
A fucking blastula is a non-sentient bundle of cells. And boy and howdy does "non-sentient" extend for quite a while (~3-4 months) before enough infrastructure is grown for the organism to react to pain stimuli (something, I might add, flatworms have been able to master (reacting that is)).
And yet your equating a person, a child, a teenager to something that, in this case, can do less than a flatworm reactions.
Most people who think differently are usually fucking wrong with respect to basic human embryology.
And I think that includes you.
Slave to the Patriarchy no more
