Logical Fallacies

[Chris.Roth]

My point is simple. The gamers are shamed. The debator, Galloway, is given defense from the most intelligent forum I can find. (this one.) Are you defending fallacies?

I wouldn't characterize anything that's been said here as defending Galloway. Understanding that his methods work on the credulous =/= defending those methods.

Personally, I find debate to be a poor method for determining what is true.

I feel inclined to ask, what do you find to be the most objective way of defining what is "true"? (It's not like the Iraq war is hard to find facts on, by all means, you can find almost anything to defend any position from the internet.)