RE: Christians
September 19, 2009 at 5:35 am
(This post was last modified: September 19, 2009 at 5:35 am by Ace Otana.)
(September 19, 2009 at 2:11 am)Arcanus Wrote: That is indeed a contradiction. His signature explicitly states, "God does not exist"—and yet to Rhizo he states, "I'm not saying [God] does not exist." One of those statements must be incorrect, because as they stand it is a logical contradiction. Given his explanation to Rhizo, the incorrect statement is his signature (and should be changed).
Fuck me you still didn't get it!
![[Image: facepalm.jpg]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=scienceblogs.com%2Finsolence%2Ffacepalm.jpg)
I've said, I'm not claiming there is no god. I'm saying god does not exist in the eyes of science and observation. As in there is no evidence found to suggest there is a god. So by saying there is no god in the eyes of observation, I'm being truthful. I'm actually saying there is no evidence that suggests that a god exists and so saying god does not exist is a conclusion based on lack of evidence to say it does. I'm sure everyone else got it!
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence - Carl Sagan
Mankind's intelligence walks hand in hand with it's stupidity.
Being an atheist says nothing about your overall intelligence, it just means you don't believe in god. Atheists can be as bright as any scientist and as stupid as any creationist.
You never really know just how stupid someone is, until you've argued with them.
Mankind's intelligence walks hand in hand with it's stupidity.
Being an atheist says nothing about your overall intelligence, it just means you don't believe in god. Atheists can be as bright as any scientist and as stupid as any creationist.
You never really know just how stupid someone is, until you've argued with them.
