(July 23, 2013 at 3:30 am)Godschild Wrote:(July 23, 2013 at 3:00 am)AnunZi Wrote: Would this be a xiatain “Scientist” (or should I say, Scientician) or someone who actually knows what the term “Peer review process means”?
Two nuclear engineers, one who is respected around the country, the other his father, another who works for ORNL and publishes papers for peer review for scientific journals. Another a college professor. I've studied with these men, even taught one when he was a youth.
Yet still they think blind faith, in something with absolutely zero supporting evidence is a good thing? Personally I simply cannot reconcile that view with anything supported by the peer review process or scientific method. Its just plain hypocrisy.
I cannot help but wonder what their view points would be if they lived in a secular country, where being an atheist wasn’t viewed with hate and bile. (I’m assuming you live in America here, please correct me if I am wrong)
"A man who keeps one eye on the past is blind in one eye. A man who ignores the past is blind in both."
