(January 18, 2014 at 3:42 pm)Sword of Christ Wrote: If you already decided that you will only ever accept strict scientific evidence for God to begin with and it's impossible to have strict scientific evidence for God because God isn't physically existent then you can't really simply claim that there is no evidence for God. There are certain kinds of evidence which you already decided not to accept in favor of evidence that can't exist so.
Ah, well, see, there's your problem: I never said I'd only accept scientific evidence. I just said that the evidence you and yours provide is nonsense and insufficient for the types of claims you're making. So your premise here, and your smug little diagram, have just gone up in flames.
Quote:Philosophical evidence, historical evidence, subjective evidence, Biblical evidence. You can't have scientific evidence for God, though certainly what science has revealed about the universe so far demonstrates an incredible amount complex structure and well ordered balance. It gets to the point when a random chance coincidence would be more incredible than God.
That's not evidence, those are types of evidence. I believe I was asking for something specific, and you can cut the biblical evidence out right now, because you can't confirm the claims of the bible by referring to a part of the bible.
Quote:Here you go.
Holy fucking shit, that is the dumbest thing you could possibly have said at this point in time.
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!