(May 22, 2014 at 6:57 am)Heywood Wrote: The example does work. Bad Wolf's claim was that a baby has a stronger right to exist then a zygote because we value them more. I was showing him the state of possessing existence rights has nothing to do with value by showing him that the state of being a car has nothing to do with its value.
You are still equivocating zygote and baby. I tried to make the distinction clear using your analogy by comparing a fully operable car with the stack of prints and incomplete collection of raw materials.
Do you understand the distinction or are you intentionally evading the obvious consideration?