RE: Abortion and Global warming
May 22, 2014 at 9:48 am
(This post was last modified: May 22, 2014 at 9:53 am by Losty.)
(May 22, 2014 at 5:26 am)Fidel_Castronaut Wrote:(May 22, 2014 at 3:17 am)Losty Wrote: Will everyone please stop saying future people
I asked him what a future person was on page 1...
Yea well we all know how Heywood is with questions. Everyone kept saying it like it was a thing though. I can't take a conversation about a 'future person' seriously. It's too funny.
(May 22, 2014 at 8:40 am)Esquilax Wrote:(May 22, 2014 at 8:15 am)Heywood Wrote: I ignored your point because it was superfluous. Is a baby a more developed human being then a zygote? Of course it is. Because the zygote is less developed does it make it not a human being? Of course not....if that were the case 2 year olds would not be human beings.
So what criteria are you using to determine humanity? As I mentioned in the other abortion thread, it can't solely be genetics because that makes a lot of things that aren't humans, human too. You seem to be just asserting that zygotes possess this attribute without any criteria that would point to that, nor anything other than special pleading to prevent us from extending that same attribute further back to the sperm and the egg, or forward to, say, human fingernails.
I'm replying as I am catching up. I just wanted to say before I move further down, if Heywood answers this question from you I will cry. I have asked him at least 5 times now.