RE: Abortion and Global warming
May 22, 2014 at 11:23 am
(This post was last modified: May 22, 2014 at 11:25 am by Fidel_Castronaut.)
(May 22, 2014 at 11:16 am)Heywood Wrote:(May 22, 2014 at 11:12 am)Fidel_Castronaut Wrote: Ok. That doesn't actually answer anything.
When the subject matter is one of subjective interpretation of when life begins, dismissing a request that seeks to elucidate where the line is drawn is foolish and not conducive to furthering the debate.
There is no subjective interpretation except by those who don't like what science has told us.
What has 'science told us'? Where has 'science told us' this? Where have you taken this conclusion from?
You are demonstrably incorrect when you assert that there 'is no subjective interpretation' when this very thread evidences the contrary.
Sort of seems like you're just dismissing points/opinions contrary to yours based on your own foregone conclusion.
(May 22, 2014 at 11:16 am)Heywood Wrote: The life cycle of a human being is very well understood. You should not deny science just so you can take the position you want on abortion.
Your position that one is 'denying science' is pretty far from being evidenced, and can thus be dismissed as nothing more than grandstanding.
Love atheistforums.org? Consider becoming a patreon and helping towards our server costs.