RE: Abortion and Global warming
May 22, 2014 at 7:29 pm
(This post was last modified: May 22, 2014 at 7:30 pm by Rampant.A.I..)
(May 22, 2014 at 4:21 pm)Pickup_shonuff Wrote:(May 20, 2014 at 12:28 pm)Heywood Wrote: Today a friend whom I argue politics with lamented that he didn't care if humans destroyed the earth but that I should since I have children.
So that got me wondering. If future generations have a right to a clean and livable earth why don't they have a right to exist? Essentially a conclusion of the pro abortion movement is that future people don't have a right to exist. The right of existence only comes into being after one is born. Well if they don't have a right to exist then they certainly don't have a right to a clean and livable earth.
How does someone who is pro abortion justify fighting against global warming? Do not the rights and needs of the people today supersede the rights and need of future people?
People who aren't born have a right to exist? So you mean every opportunity one has to copulate, it is their duty to do so? Something tells me you didn't think this through, Heywood.
As to the persons who DO and WILL exist, including us and future generations, yes, they have a right to a habitable planet in the same way that you have the right to not choke on your own oxygen. We all share the air we breathe and we all have a duty to protect it.
http://youtu.be/fUspLVStPbk
