RE: Gay pair to adopt children of unfit Catholic parents
May 27, 2014 at 9:27 pm
(This post was last modified: May 27, 2014 at 9:32 pm by Bittersmart.)
(May 27, 2014 at 5:14 pm)kılıç_mehmet Wrote:(May 26, 2014 at 5:49 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: Well, you can't be sure of it, but the odds are certainly in favour of these kids being better off than they were.Well, if parenting is all about giving them material goods, toys, food...Perhaps, who knows. But I personally don't think that these people were ever meant to be parents.
Boru
It is not natural for a child to have two fathers.
It makes no real sense. They should be given to normal people.
Catholic or non-catholic.
Gay people are normal people. They're just different from you, just like all the other kinds of people that are different from you. And who are you to decide what a "natural" family is? There are many different types of families all over the world that produce well-rounded children. You need to re-evaluate your views if you believe there is something detrimental about being gay and/or being raised by gay people.
kılıç_mehmet Wrote:I'm not denying a child his candy.
I'm merely stating a fact. Gay people should not be parents, merely due to the fact that they were not meant to be parents. Their type of "parenting" and "family" are do not have a place in human society, nor in nature.
If there was any type of logic behind it, I could perhaps understand. The only logic is that they want it(their excuse). They want to "have" children.
This amounts to redefining important social institutions according to the wishes of a minority that were never a part of it to begin with.
We have to reconfigure everything according to how they would wish it. Now instead of propagating the ideal of a family with a father and mother, we should think of every possible combination that can occur to us. Why? Merely because they want it. They are like children themselves, how do you expect them to look after children?
They do not even know the responsibilities. And they do not care about whatever hardships the child might face in the future.
I based my arguments on two things: the fate of the familial institution, meaning, the basis of human society and future, and the fate of children.
Most of the arguments of the opposing side only arise from mere demand.
The claims are without foundation and basis.
Wow, this post is putrid.
Do you actually know any gay parents? Because I do, and they're wonderful. Their children are wonderful. Your views on gay people are horrendous. You seem to think gay people are some kind of different species instead of actual human beings. I find this bigotry sickening. Frankly, I think YOU would be an unfit parent if you were teach this tripe to impressionable children.