(May 27, 2014 at 8:57 pm)kılıç_mehmet Wrote:(May 27, 2014 at 8:43 pm)Mothonis_Cathicgal Wrote: Nope normal is defined by emotion in this sense.Unless they are abused,disadvantaged,or poor they have a normal life.Denying people based solely on the fact that they are of the same sex is a extremely lousy excuse.I'm not denying a child his candy.
I'm merely stating a fact. Gay people should not be parents, merely due to the fact that they were not meant to be parents. Their type of "parenting" and "family" are do not have a place in human society, nor in nature.
If there was any type of logic behind it, I could perhaps understand. The only logic is that they want it(their excuse). They want to "have" children.
This amounts to redefining important social institutions according to the wishes of a minority that were never a part of it to begin with.
We have to reconfigure everything according to how they would wish it. Now instead of propagating the ideal of a family with a father and mother, we should think of every possible combination that can occur to us. Why? Merely because they want it. They are like children themselves, how do you expect them to look after children?
They do not even know the responsibilities. And they do not care about whatever hardships the child might face in the future.
I based my arguments on two things: the fate of the familial institution, meaning, the basis of human society and future, and the fate of children.
Most of the arguments of the opposing side only arise from mere demand.
The claims are without foundation and basis.
To be even more honest, this demand is now giving rise to whole new degeneracies. Gays buying children from less-fortunate countries, paying women to be surrogates. It is absolutely disgusting. I think that this whole madness needs to stop.
Its unethical on so many degrees that it cannot be whitewashed.
http://m.nydailynews.com/life-style/heal...-1.1365963
