(April 22, 2018 at 5:47 pm)Hammy Wrote:(April 22, 2018 at 5:45 pm)Shell B Wrote: I just want to point, for the umpteenth time, that a member being a mod is irrelevant when they're not acting as mod. Yes, I know I'm not staff, but I do know it's a common misconception. Hammy, you know this. He's not being a "douche to you" as a mod. Saying "a mod being a douche to you" makes it sound like he is.
I know it's not relevant but I don't think he's good at his job either (especially considering he claims to have been responsible for a lot of the recent changes to the forum, which are negative changes IMO).
But this is simply my opinion. Clearly the staff as a whole think he's good at being a mod otherwise they wouldn't keep him. Whilst we're being irrelevant I may as well give my opinion.
I didn't say that he needs to act professional as a mod. He's still acting more professional than I did as a mod. Which I'm more than willing to admit. I think I was good at being a mod though. Or at least, not crap at it.
I didn't say you said he needs to act professional. I'm simply pointing out that saying "a mod was a douche to me." Is like saying, "mods are allowed to officially be douches," which I don't recall being the case. Acting as member: douche away. Acting as mod: less douche necessary. It's a nit-picking thing, but I know I hated when people made it sound like I wasn't allowed to be a bitch just because I was staff.