RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
December 8, 2015 at 11:20 am
(December 8, 2015 at 5:15 am)LastPoet Wrote: Lol be prepared to a megaton of whining.
I had a sense by his act that he was reporting people left and right. How many did I have?
Sorry , that information is.. Classified.
(December 8, 2015 at 5:50 am)Judi Lynn Wrote: Sorry, but I could not listen to that babble. As long as I wasn't mentioned, I don't care what his "friend" has to say. However, I will say this:
I firmly believe that any slandering of any member here on that recording falls outside of this site and therefore should be taken into consideration when it comes time to remove his ban. If he is willing to go outside of these forums to cause harm (obviously, not physical) to anyone here, then that is a form of abuse and should not be tolerated. By anyone period.
It is one thing to express things here, as long as they are within the rules here. It is quite another to do it outside of this arena. And although we cannot prove he is in fact his "friend", it should also be considered that any such recordings of hate towards any of the members here by a third party not a member of these forums should be considered as harassment. He's already left a message for me personally in another thread. He tried to remove it before anyone was able get the link, but he failed.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't it against the rules for a member who has been here less than 30 days to be able to post links in posts unless they directly relate to the topic being discussed? If so, then he has clearly broken that rule a few times too.
No you are not wrong, Judy. That was also taken into account with his ban-age. We take personal attacks very seriously and I myself reported that personal recording he made for you for admins to review. He has been banned in a consensus and whilst it may not be permanent--he will either come back and behave like a big boy, or be gone forever.
(December 8, 2015 at 8:52 am)Losty Wrote:(December 8, 2015 at 2:36 am)Luckie Wrote: Since it's not against the rules for me to post outside links in this forum, I wanted to share with all of you just the single most prolific post I read by our newly temporarily departed friend Despondentdude.
His "friend" made a speech and told him to post this for us. Its sooooooo mind blowing omgawd!
http://vocaroo.com/i/s0XEiczGF5Y2
Seriously you allll have to listen to this it's so original!
*please note I did not listen to all of it so don't blame me for anything past the tanning bed section.
Thank you for sharing I am dying
Don't thank me, thank, like , his friend! ^_^
If I were to create self aware beings knowing fully what they would do in their lifetimes, I sure wouldn't create a HELL for the majority of them to live in infinitely! That's not Love, that's sadistic. Therefore a truly loving god does not exist!
Dead wrong. The actions of a finite being measured against an infinite one are infinitesimal and therefore merit infinitesimal punishment.
I say again: No exceptions. Punishment should be equal to the crime, not in excess of it. As soon as the punishment is greater than the crime, the punisher is in the wrong.
Quote:The sin is against an infinite being (God) unforgiven infinitely, therefore the punishment is infinite.
Dead wrong. The actions of a finite being measured against an infinite one are infinitesimal and therefore merit infinitesimal punishment.
Quote:Some people deserve hell.
I say again: No exceptions. Punishment should be equal to the crime, not in excess of it. As soon as the punishment is greater than the crime, the punisher is in the wrong.