Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.

[Huggy Bear]

Hilarious...

The person voted best debater of these forums, literally had to have the difference between between 'headstone" (a noun) and "head stone" (an adjective used to describe a noun), explained to him by a so called "vegetable".

This "best debater" also had to have the fact that bees don't need to fertilize their eggs in order to reproduce explained to him by the very same  "vegetable".

I could bring up other examples, but I think you get the point...

So if the forums best debater by popular consensus has to constantly be educated by a 'vegetable', you're basically saying that he's dumber than a vegetable, and seeing how he's the forums best (atheist), what does that say about you?

Lmao, omg. Ten years from now you will still be bringing up the bee thing.  You’re like the Trump supporters who keep talking about Hillary two years after the election.  One factual inaccuracy does not mean a person doesn’t possess strong debate skills, you twat.  Every time you bring it up I am embarrassed for you.

One? Can you count? I posted two examples, and definitely can provide more sweetie...

If your arguments can be proven false, then by definition it's a terrible argument.

If you consistently make terrible arguments, then by definition you are a terrible debater...


Do you want evidence to support a claim, or don't you? If I claim someone is a terrible debater, I'm more than happy to back it up with evidence; but the real reason for bringing up old posts is to provide context for new readers unfamiliar with past history...