RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
September 23, 2018 at 3:01 pm
(This post was last modified: September 23, 2018 at 3:05 pm by LadyForCamus.)
(September 22, 2018 at 11:47 pm)Huggy74 Wrote: One? Can you count? I posted two examples, and definitely can provide more sweetie...
Oh, sorry. Two. That changes everything.
Quote:If you consistently make terrible arguments, then by definition you are a terrible debater...
Don’t be so hard on yourself. Sweetie.
Quote:Do you want evidence to support a claim, or don't you? If I claim someone is a terrible debater, I'm more than happy to back it up with evidence; but the real reason for bringing up old posts is to provide context for new readers unfamiliar with past history...
Well, thank god they have you then! We wouldn’t want any newbies getting the impression that Khemical is a skilled debater without first hearing how he got something wrong about bee reproduction one time. We want people making rational decisions, after all.
Nay_Sayer: “Nothing is impossible if you dream big enough, or in this case, nothing is impossible if you use a barrel of KY Jelly and a miniature horse.”
Wiser words were never spoken.
Wiser words were never spoken.