Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.

[Angrboda]

Sure.  I'll start you off.  Counting the two you've already claimed, you have to show indisputable evidence that you won at least two of the following debates, or produce additional debates that I've missed.

https://atheistforums.org/thread-53040-page-13.html

---

You know...I sometimes wonder what some random w. african circa 1400 would think if I handed them a time machine, and they could watch their descendants become shoddy apologists for the religion of those who would enslave and oppress their own children for the next few subsequent centuries.  Sad fucking state of affairs, if you ask me.

---

Indisputable fact...

No, it simply shows that you're capable of the fallacy of ignoratio elenchi. You were claiming that the original Hebrews were black. For evidence you brought out that some of the oldest Jewish communities in Africa were black, and that an Ethiopian came to Jerusalem and read Jewish literature. Neither of those show that the original Hebrews were black, much less indisputably so. You also claimed that "Jews" refers to the sons of Judah. First, the question wasn't whether or not the sons of Judah were mostly blacks, but whether the original Hebrews were black. Even if you had good evidence that the original sons of Judah were black, which you don't, it wouldn't be indisputable evidence that the original Hebrews were black. So that point fails as well.

---

Humans are not more important to an ecosystem than bees.
https://earthjustice.org/blog/2013-augus...-honeybees

Humans depend on bees, not the other way around.

---

First off, there were apparently two debates in that thread. One, whether you were right that bees are the single most important organism (in the ecosystem), and whether humans would die without the bee. You claim that bees are the most important because we depend upon them and not the reverse. You've got a good point. It's not indisputable, but I'll give you that one. Did you demonstrate that we would die without the bee? No, you mentioned scurvy, but we both could synthesize vitamin C, and since we all die, the apparent meaning of your phrase "we pretty much die" is that the human species would cease to exist, which you didn't in any sense demonstrate. So that adds an additional debate to the eight we already had, and provides you with a win. Unfortunately, because it adds an additional debate to the list, you gain no ground by winning that one debate. You still need to provide indisputable evidence that you won two additional debates out of those remaining.