RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
January 19, 2015 at 4:30 pm
(This post was last modified: January 19, 2015 at 4:32 pm by John V.)
(January 19, 2015 at 4:12 pm)Napoléon Wrote: Then you're reading it through some kind of rose tinted glasses.Oh noes!
The first two responses I made to frodo in that thread were directly on topic to what the thread was about. No problems.
I didn't post for another 6/7 pages until I re-read and noticed he had since directly accused the staff of trolling.
Imagine...someone on an internet forum accused someone else of trolling...
Maybe mods should be issued some lube so their butts don't get hurt so easily. Ask Exlax, he's probably got some quality stuff.
(January 19, 2015 at 4:18 pm)Stimbo Wrote: If anyone files a report that in their view raises a rule breach, it will be assessed and discussed appropriately. Whatever a person's religious affiliation happens to be has no bearing on the matter whatsoever. Whether the report is justified is our job to decide, not yours. It's a lot like reporting someone to the police - that you think the person is guilty is surprisingly irrelevant.Ah, so you get in trouble if you make a frivolous report, but you can't know if it's frivolous until the mods rule on it. Nothing could possibly go wrong with that system...
What we don't appreciate and will come down hard on is abuse of the report system - making prank calls if you like.