RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
January 19, 2015 at 6:10 pm
(This post was last modified: January 19, 2015 at 6:11 pm by Fidel_Castronaut.)
(January 19, 2015 at 5:54 pm)alpha male Wrote:(January 19, 2015 at 5:48 pm)SteelCurtain Wrote: alpha male, are you suggesting something here or you just bitching?I'm suggesting that the moderation here is biased. I don't know why they don't just admit it.
We try and eliminate bias as much as possible.
Often we've had reports about posts that 'people don't like', theist and atheist alike, but we don't action on it, not for that reason alone anyway.
For example, some of the things you've said on this thread have been outright lies and misrepresentations of the facts. But I don't want to ban you because of it.
We don't ban people because of their beliefs, after all. If that were true, and there's an inherent bias against theists on here, then why does it not say banned under your name?
Some mods wont like some members. Obvious truth is obvious. Hence why we have a quorum system. If there were any decent theists on the board we'd promote them too, like Ryaan when he was on the staff. But there aren't any.
So you can keep accusing us of being butt hurt despite not being in full possession of the facts & actually acting more butt hurt then any of us appear to be (butt hurt over what btw? I don't get it), but you won't get banned for it. Not now at least.
Love atheistforums.org? Consider becoming a patreon and helping towards our server costs.