Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.

[Esquilax]

I did, after the warning above. I can show multiple PMs from mods saying that no rules were broken. So, I stopped, as the bias was (and still is) apparent.

I think this is the problem here, and it's emblematic of what's gone wrong in John's brain: he made some reports, got back votes from us for no action, and then decided based solely on the fact that we disagreed with him on that (I'd also hasten to mention that, generally, a mod reply for a no action report will come with an explanation as to why we think that way) that we must be biased.

The idea that he might have just submitted some non-actionable reports didn't even cross his mind, by the looks of things. No, that would indicate that he was wrong, and we can't have that. So we must just be biased, and out to get him and his religion, because there's simply no reason anybody could disagree with John's position on anything, he's clearly always right, so... we must just hate him!