RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
April 3, 2015 at 5:17 pm
(April 3, 2015 at 5:09 pm)Stimbo Wrote:(April 3, 2015 at 4:58 pm)Pizz-atheist Wrote: It's not like Nestor was naming names.
That's kind of the point. Stripping the quotes from all context in that way is a dick move in itself. The only possible reasoning behind it is an attempt to circumvent the Rules, given that providing the names is a clear breach of them.
Maybe you can clarify a context in which the quotes I included would not be utterly moronic. Good luck with that. If I had made a thread called "Stupid things Christians say" or had singled out the comments of Christians or Muslims that are on here for saying some dumb shit, would it have caused any concern? Sounds to me like a double standard, and that certain members would rather avoid confronting their own bullshit while feeling free to disparage every other remark they disagree with it. And the fact that I didn't name names means any one of those statements could have been taken generically, because believe me, I'm sure you'll hear those stupid replies again in the future.
While we're on the subject of rules, how does the staff ignore the title of this thread? http://atheistforums.org/thread-32518.html
I'm pretty sure there's a rule against doing that. It took staff 5 minutes to ask me to change my title when I made a thread directed at bennyboy a few months back. Anyone want to state a reason for the lack of mod action in this case?
He who loves God cannot endeavour that God should love him in return - Baruch Spinoza
