RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
April 5, 2015 at 3:11 am
(April 5, 2015 at 12:02 am)whateverist Wrote: Their rule number 3 leaves something to be desired:Only if your desire is to be intentionally blasphemous or unnecessarily disruptive. If your desire is for serious discussion, you're fine.
"3. Thou SHALL NOT be intentionally blasphemous or unnecessarily disruptive. Emphasis on "unnecessarily disruptive." We will ban you if you are presenting yourself as an unneeded distraction (yes this is subjective - live with it). Be mindful of the spirit of the discussion."
Here's a thread with challenges to Biblical accuracy. Check out the poster - an atheist with 2,400 posts who's been there over 10 years.
http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/sho...p?t=109323