Naturalistic spirituality is a complete fucking oxymoron. What is the point in using a word so entwined and tainted by religious/supernatural thinking? It to me seems like a bullshit attempt at common ground with those who believe in the supernatural, all you achieve by using it is a false sense of being on the same page when in reality the two are entirely different positions, one is referring to the thoughts and emotions of a person as if they are related to something supernatural and the other as the illusory abstracts that arise from the physical brain, but they are both using the same word. Naturalists should ditch the word spiritual/spirit/spirituality altogether, for the sake of coherency if nothing else, it's practically useless in it's current ambiguity and you achieve absolutely no clarity by whoring it out to both sides of the mind/brain debate.
.
