(November 29, 2008 at 12:45 pm)Psalm 23 Wrote:No, I mean Pastafarianism. I do know the name of my religion you know.(November 28, 2008 at 4:59 pm)Tiberius Wrote: Ahem. We have a living prophet of Pastafarianism (thats better that your religion), and we have a holy book (The Gospel of the Flying Spaghetti Monster), and we have several hundred sightings of the FSM is pieces of toast, walls, etc. There are even molecules that look like Him. Exactly how much evidence do you want?I think you mean, "Rastafarianism."Do you follow the words of Leonard Howell?
(November 29, 2008 at 12:45 pm)Psalm 23 Wrote:2005 is the year the FSM religion, Pastafarianism was first revealed to the world. Bobby Henderson was the first prophet, and I have visions of the FSM from time to time, as well as finding evidences of Him in the world.Quote:Since when did age of a document add to its veracity anyway? If that logic worked, why do we not think the Earth is flat? Ancient documents claim that to be the truth! Theists are blinded by their religious texts, and they rarely question them.1999 seems to the year of Rastafarianism. Has anyone in this religion spoken to the Flying Spaghetti Monster?
Might I ask you a questions though? You say that you only recognize religions that have been revealed in ancient documents. Why is this? Why do you trust ancient documents so much? How do you know they are correct and not the mindless ravings of an ancient lunatic? You put a lot of faith in ancient documents, when ancient documents have contributed nearly nothing to modern science and understanding. I just want a straight answer to this one:
Why do you put so much faith and trust in ancient documents and not as much in modern ones?
