(June 21, 2015 at 11:11 am)Huggy74 Wrote: So it's still your position that since I quoted you in my post, that I was referring directly to you, even after making it very clear I was speaking generally and not about you personally?
No. My position is that by taking my words out of context, and battering others with them, you're abusing truth.
(June 21, 2015 at 11:11 am)Huggy74 Wrote: As you can see, you quoted me in your own post.
http://atheistforums.org/thread-30219-po...#pid816960
(December 12, 2014 at 1:54 pm)Parkers Tan Wrote: I wasn't aiming that comment at you directly, and I should have made that clear; my apologies.Hold up! did you just state that the comment in your post which quoted me wasn't in fact directed at me?
Why then can you not comprehend when I stated that my post wasn't directed at you personally?
Also, if you or anyone has any evidence of me being dishonest, post it, and well compare that evidence (which you will be hard pressed to find) against the evidence I have on you....
The difference is that when you pointed out my fuck-up, I apologized to you directly and publicly.
That is called integrity. It's no wonder you're lost in this exchange; you have no conception of such a thing as integrity, or adhering to the truth. When I'm shown wrong, I admit it, and apologize for any offense tendered. You, on the other hand, not only practice that which has given you offense, you refuse to accept apologies (i.e. you refuse to extend forgiveness) even when apologies are given.
Some Christian you are. Tell me again how your faith makes you a good man.
