Oh, the humanities.
Thank atheist god i'm not in one of those bullshit peddling fields. None of you lot (those in the social sciences)
can actually figure out left from right, but rather, you all provide hypotheses that "explain the most". Luxenburg may be right, an Islamic scholar may be right, but guess what? we can't know, because you've got no way to falsify hypotheses, and the humanities don't really cater to falsification in general. To substitute, they provide long winded discussions about how they think they're right, despite their belief in parsimony.
On that note, I'll stick to science, where the bullshit becomes apparent fairly quickly.
Enjoy chasing the wind
Thank atheist god i'm not in one of those bullshit peddling fields. None of you lot (those in the social sciences)
can actually figure out left from right, but rather, you all provide hypotheses that "explain the most". Luxenburg may be right, an Islamic scholar may be right, but guess what? we can't know, because you've got no way to falsify hypotheses, and the humanities don't really cater to falsification in general. To substitute, they provide long winded discussions about how they think they're right, despite their belief in parsimony.
On that note, I'll stick to science, where the bullshit becomes apparent fairly quickly.
Enjoy chasing the wind
Plato had defined Man as an animal, biped and featherless, and was applauded. Diogenes plucked a fowl and brought it into the lecture room with the words,
"Behold Plato's man!"
