(April 11, 2016 at 11:16 pm)AAA Wrote:(April 11, 2016 at 10:43 pm)The_Empress Wrote: I'm sorry; what?? Newton has been regularly peer-reviewed for centuries.
Really? Because most of his writings weren't read until after he died. Also I still don't get why we can't interpret the peer-reviewed information for ourselves. If you agree that we can, then there is no point in us arguing about it.
I don't know why I keep coming back to this thread. My patience is wearing thin; not to mention the wall next to my computer.
Nolite te bastardes carborundorum.