RE: Self-Validating Empirical Epistemology?
May 20, 2016 at 4:18 pm
(This post was last modified: May 20, 2016 at 4:29 pm by Ignorant.)
(May 20, 2016 at 5:43 am)Ben Davis Wrote: It's very simple: we compare 'truths' that are empirically validated with one that are not then hold the results up against reality to see which remain true. Tadaaa! Empirical validation of the proposition.
Sometimes I think theists think that no-one's thought of this stuff already...
Are original questions the only sort of questions welcome on this site? If so, let me know and I won't return (I am quite sure any question I [edit: would] have has been asked before).
As to your response: What you describe does not seem like empirical validation of the original proposition. Rather, it seems like empirical validation of particular truths.
I haven't interacted with you yet on these forums. I just want to know what you think about these things. I am not presenting an argument.