(May 26, 2016 at 5:41 am)Constable Dorfl Wrote: Because it is an axiom, not an argument.Technically, it is not an axiom because the counterfactual (not all propositions must be empirically verified) could be true. As an first principle it is self-refuting. It's actually an initial premise. While it serves as a good guide for doing natural science, it is worthless for establishing metaphysical claims such at the nature of being-as-such.
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: May 17, 2024, 7:11 pm
Thread Rating:
Self-Validating Empirical Epistemology?
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)