Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: May 9, 2024, 4:44 pm

Poll: Monogamous or not
This poll is closed.
monogamous
76.92%
30 76.92%
not monogamous
15.38%
6 15.38%
some other description
7.69%
3 7.69%
Total 39 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Monogamous or not.
#76
RE: Monogamous or not.
(June 27, 2016 at 7:38 am)paulpablo Wrote:
(June 27, 2016 at 7:36 am)MJ the Skeptical Wrote: So fucking dumb and generalized...there are plenty of factors why it's hard to find a minority group which has nothing to do "not being able to use the internet" you condescending cunt.

Like; Location, Specific desires, Your gender, Your age, Your demeanor, Your choices etc.

Yeah, in your anecdotal subjective experience it was easy, good for you romeo, you don't get to generalize people who can't because it was "easy" for you, that's fucking stupid. You even admit if people go around saying they don't fall under the strict monogamous label it's not going to be easy to find like minded people, as is such the case on the internet. Especially if you are a guy, who has to try much harder than a woman does to find what he wants. And yet again you are just dead fucking wrong, just because you are non-monogamous does not mean you are always around tons of vaginas. You could just not be into relationships which would disqualify you from monogamy as well.

You are a piece of shit on the end of my shoe, lick yourself off my shoe, go on lick it.

I didn't say there wasn't many reasons why it's difficult to find a minority group. I said if you have an Internet connection and you can't find non monogamous women you must be bad at using the Internet you stupid sack of cat shit.

You smell like a donkey's ball sack and I can smell you from here. You're the one who is generalising by saying that non monogamy results in being unattractive to women, I didn't generalise, I told my personal experience and I presented it as my personal experience, I then made what I think is a logical statement in that if you are non monogamous then you're attracting at least two women during a short period of time.

You massive fat twat

1) Yes you did say it was easy if you have the internet, you said it wasn't hard to find non-monogamous people if you had that, which is beyond retarded and generalized.

2) Yes I did say non-monogamy is unattractive to most women, even not being into relationships, which is also non-monogamy, retard x2.

3) You generalized all people who couldn't find what they want as being bad at using the internet when there are more factors there, retard x3.

4) No, you don't have to be in the proximity of two vaginas to be non-monogamous, because like I said you autistic empty vessel, that you could not be into relationships which would also put you in the non-monogamy category.

Oh, if only I knew how to use the internet, I could find what I want in the middle of nowhere huh? Did you miss all of the reasons I gave? I guess so. Just an intellectually bankrupt tool.
If the hypothetical idea of an afterlife means more to you than the objectively true reality we all share, then you deserve no respect.
Reply



Messages In This Thread
Monogamous or not. - by paulpablo - June 5, 2016 at 10:14 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Thumpalumpacus - June 5, 2016 at 10:21 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Chad32 - June 5, 2016 at 10:23 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by paulpablo - June 5, 2016 at 10:27 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Ravenshire - June 5, 2016 at 10:53 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Losty - June 5, 2016 at 10:26 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Edwardo Piet - June 6, 2016 at 7:28 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Regina - June 5, 2016 at 10:38 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by paulpablo - June 5, 2016 at 10:52 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Regina - June 5, 2016 at 10:59 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Chad32 - June 5, 2016 at 10:39 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Losty - June 5, 2016 at 10:41 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Chad32 - June 6, 2016 at 7:37 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Jenny A - June 6, 2016 at 2:50 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Chad32 - June 6, 2016 at 3:53 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Heatheness - June 5, 2016 at 10:43 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by J a c k - June 5, 2016 at 10:55 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Catholic_Lady - June 5, 2016 at 10:56 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by ignoramus - June 5, 2016 at 11:01 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Regina - June 5, 2016 at 11:02 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by ignoramus - June 5, 2016 at 11:06 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Regina - June 5, 2016 at 11:07 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Thumpalumpacus - June 6, 2016 at 11:19 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by madog - June 5, 2016 at 11:11 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by ignoramus - June 6, 2016 at 12:11 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Little lunch - June 6, 2016 at 12:39 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Losty - June 6, 2016 at 4:00 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by robvalue - June 6, 2016 at 6:02 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Edwardo Piet - June 6, 2016 at 6:37 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by SofaKingHigh - June 6, 2016 at 4:13 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by MJ the Skeptical - June 6, 2016 at 4:26 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by paulpablo - June 6, 2016 at 6:10 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by MJ the Skeptical - June 6, 2016 at 8:08 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by paulpablo - June 6, 2016 at 8:31 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by brewer - June 7, 2016 at 6:54 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by paulpablo - June 7, 2016 at 7:32 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by brewer - June 7, 2016 at 7:35 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by MJ the Skeptical - June 9, 2016 at 4:55 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by paulpablo - June 9, 2016 at 8:13 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by MJ the Skeptical - June 27, 2016 at 7:36 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by paulpablo - June 27, 2016 at 7:38 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by SofaKingHigh - June 27, 2016 at 8:05 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by MJ the Skeptical - June 27, 2016 at 8:09 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by SofaKingHigh - June 27, 2016 at 8:10 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by MJ the Skeptical - June 27, 2016 at 8:11 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by SofaKingHigh - June 27, 2016 at 8:12 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by MJ the Skeptical - June 27, 2016 at 8:14 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by SofaKingHigh - June 27, 2016 at 8:15 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by MJ the Skeptical - June 27, 2016 at 8:19 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by SofaKingHigh - June 27, 2016 at 8:22 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by MJ the Skeptical - June 27, 2016 at 8:25 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by SofaKingHigh - June 27, 2016 at 8:27 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by MJ the Skeptical - June 27, 2016 at 8:28 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by SofaKingHigh - June 27, 2016 at 9:07 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by bennyboy - June 27, 2016 at 8:10 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by MJ the Skeptical - June 27, 2016 at 8:13 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by MJ the Skeptical - June 27, 2016 at 8:06 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by paulpablo - June 27, 2016 at 8:25 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by MJ the Skeptical - June 27, 2016 at 8:30 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by paulpablo - June 27, 2016 at 9:17 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by MJ the Skeptical - July 16, 2016 at 7:07 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by paulpablo - June 27, 2016 at 11:56 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by MJ the Skeptical - July 16, 2016 at 7:09 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Little lunch - June 6, 2016 at 7:36 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by robvalue - June 6, 2016 at 6:01 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by account_inactive - June 6, 2016 at 6:24 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by brewer - June 6, 2016 at 7:39 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Jenny A - June 6, 2016 at 2:44 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Edwardo Piet - June 6, 2016 at 4:20 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Gemini - June 6, 2016 at 8:46 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Athene - June 6, 2016 at 9:39 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by KevinM1 - June 7, 2016 at 1:58 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Catholic_Lady - June 7, 2016 at 3:41 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by robvalue - June 7, 2016 at 3:56 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by paulpablo - June 7, 2016 at 6:43 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Thumpalumpacus - June 7, 2016 at 10:12 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by MJ the Skeptical - June 9, 2016 at 4:50 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by BrianSoddingBoru4 - June 7, 2016 at 7:03 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by ignoramus - June 7, 2016 at 8:08 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by J a c k - June 7, 2016 at 8:32 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by lisah - June 11, 2016 at 8:11 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by J a c k - June 7, 2016 at 8:35 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by The Valkyrie - June 7, 2016 at 8:37 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Edwardo Piet - June 7, 2016 at 10:10 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by paulpablo - June 8, 2016 at 5:57 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Losty - June 8, 2016 at 2:48 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by robvalue - June 8, 2016 at 3:50 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by ignoramus - June 8, 2016 at 4:13 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by robvalue - June 8, 2016 at 6:39 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Regina - June 8, 2016 at 3:05 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by YahwehIsTheWay - June 9, 2016 at 10:02 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Cecelia - June 10, 2016 at 6:36 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by paulpablo - June 10, 2016 at 6:39 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Little lunch - June 27, 2016 at 7:52 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Expired - June 27, 2016 at 7:56 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Little lunch - June 27, 2016 at 7:59 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by bennyboy - June 27, 2016 at 8:07 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Little lunch - June 27, 2016 at 8:31 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by MJ the Skeptical - June 27, 2016 at 8:34 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Little lunch - June 27, 2016 at 8:53 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by chimp3 - June 27, 2016 at 9:01 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Whateverist - June 27, 2016 at 9:05 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by chimp3 - June 27, 2016 at 9:10 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Whateverist - June 27, 2016 at 6:05 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Edwardo Piet - June 27, 2016 at 9:09 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Little lunch - June 27, 2016 at 9:17 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Edwardo Piet - June 27, 2016 at 9:19 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by paulpablo - June 27, 2016 at 12:28 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by MJ the Skeptical - July 16, 2016 at 7:12 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by mlmooney89 - June 27, 2016 at 12:37 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by paulpablo - June 27, 2016 at 12:39 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by MJ the Skeptical - July 16, 2016 at 7:17 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by The Grand Nudger - June 27, 2016 at 3:25 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by The Viking - July 16, 2016 at 7:10 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by BrokenQuill92 - July 16, 2016 at 8:27 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Whateverist - July 16, 2016 at 9:16 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by rexbeccarox - July 16, 2016 at 9:55 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Whateverist - July 16, 2016 at 10:12 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by robvalue - July 17, 2016 at 1:22 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Whateverist - July 17, 2016 at 2:21 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by robvalue - July 17, 2016 at 3:18 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by The Viking - July 17, 2016 at 4:08 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by robvalue - July 17, 2016 at 4:10 am



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)