RE: Dr. Long proves life after death or no?
April 26, 2017 at 9:17 pm
(This post was last modified: April 26, 2017 at 9:18 pm by Manga.)
(April 26, 2017 at 8:41 pm)CapnAwesome Wrote:(April 26, 2017 at 7:31 pm)Neo-Scholastic Wrote: No amount of evidence, however carefully controlled or well-documented, will convince skeptics that NDE's pose a challenge to their unproven metaphysical assumption of physical causal closure.
There has never been any sort of 'carefully controlled' evidence for out of body experiences associated with NDE. Actually that's not true, there has been evidence where subjects were asked to identify what was an out of sight object on a bookshelf. Not shockingly 100% failure rate. All the evidence I've ever seen is based solely on the word of people going trauma, not on a set up experiment.
but wouldn't you say that the amount of people who were able to accurately report what happened in the hospitals while they were in trouble counts as carefully controlled evidence?
(April 26, 2017 at 7:38 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote:(April 26, 2017 at 7:31 pm)Neo-Scholastic Wrote: No amount of evidence, however carefully controlled or well-documented, will convince skeptics that NDE's pose a challenge to their unproven metaphysical assumption of physical causal closure.
But the trouble is, there is no evidence supporting the metaphysical contention that NDEs have anything other than a physical cause.
Boru
what about where people have the ability to confirm things they could not have known without an OBE? and why do they see things so clearly if their brain is malfunctioning?