(October 25, 2017 at 12:53 pm)Minimalist Wrote: And when provided with such you decline to read it - or you simply could not understand what was written.
I am wondering why I should waste my time with someone who will not even consider the possibility that your bullshit is bullshit.
I didn't decline to read it. And I still don't know what you think it is that I don't understand. I wasn't the one, who just dismissed the arguments calling the other person's reference a quack. It's one thing to make an occasional comment, but when your main rebuttal is against the person and not the reasoning or evidence... well that's just a sign of a weak argument. I am asking you to give more information, so I can look at and evaluate it. If you wish to explain, engage, and show some sign of thought on the matter, then we can have a discussion. If you want to focus on people and motives.... well I'll just keep focusing on the subject.
It is said that an argument is what convinces reasonable men and a proof is what it takes to convince even an unreasonable man. - Alexander Vilenkin
If I am shown my error, I will be the first to throw my books into the fire. - Martin Luther
If I am shown my error, I will be the first to throw my books into the fire. - Martin Luther
