Testimony: Are we being hypocritical?

[Ravenshire]

My personal position on this particular subject is that if god is penetrating the natural world with physical events such as floods, Jesus, and miracles, etc., there should be some physical evidence left behind.

That's fair. That's what biblical archeology is for. For example, we have a pretty good idea of where the pool of Bethesda was. At the same time, we do not require any physical proof of Socrates or Alexander the Great.

Discovering a location where a miracle allegedly took place goes no further towards proving the miracle than London's existence does in proving wizardry.