Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: May 20, 2024, 2:41 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Creationist "Kind" - A Classification with No Definition
#35
RE: Creationist "Kind" - A Classification with No Definition
Quote:Then you agree with me muppet...
Nope 


Quote:If all mammals are not identical then they are DISTINCT
But their similar enough to render your definition useless 


Quote:Your boi chimp basically stated there is NO DISTINCTION BETWEEN ALL MAMMALS, meaning they are all identical.
No he didn't he said they have a sweep of overarching similarities which is why they classified as mammals . He never said that all mammals are exactly the same in every way . Nor does it matter to render your definition of kind useless ans arbitrary .
Seek strength, not to be greater than my brother, but to fight my greatest enemy -- myself.

Inuit Proverb

Reply



Messages In This Thread
RE: Creationist "Kind" - A Classification with No Definition - by Amarok - March 17, 2018 at 9:18 pm

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  This is Kind of Sad Minimalist 0 414 August 19, 2017 at 9:14 pm
Last Post: Minimalist
  Different kind of Traffic Stop Minimalist 3 1215 May 13, 2015 at 3:28 pm
Last Post: vorlon13
Tongue Stuff Creationist Say Cholley71 0 722 April 21, 2013 at 1:47 am
Last Post: Cholley71
  Every Debate With A Creationist.... Minimalist 4 2668 September 13, 2011 at 7:43 am
Last Post: searchingforanswers
  Funny pics of all kind Ace Otana 74 53013 September 16, 2010 at 11:59 am
Last Post: Eilonnwy
  Top 10 creationist arguments Dotard 4 1257 February 10, 2010 at 8:22 am
Last Post: Pippy



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)