RE: Arguments for God in Quran.
April 2, 2018 at 3:23 pm
(This post was last modified: April 2, 2018 at 3:24 pm by Mystic.)
Love not acting to proof and insight is acting on conjecture.
What is more evil than to value truth and falsehood equality, good and evil equally, and mix guidance with misguidance?
You have to pick one or the other.
You either believe it's reliable and act on proof and vision or not, but don't mix it all up. Opinions with True vision, falsehood with truth.
It's rather a ugly nature when we mock around like that.
If there is no God, moral judgment is not recognizing proofs of guidance, it's deciding itself, the person, and that is not morality or guidance. That is desire, nothing but sheer desire.
What is more evil than to value truth and falsehood equality, good and evil equally, and mix guidance with misguidance?
You have to pick one or the other.
You either believe it's reliable and act on proof and vision or not, but don't mix it all up. Opinions with True vision, falsehood with truth.
It's rather a ugly nature when we mock around like that.
(April 2, 2018 at 3:20 pm)FatAndFaithless Wrote:(April 2, 2018 at 3:18 pm)MysticKnight Wrote: I am saying opinion of what is good is not goodness.
Goodness is acting on love with insight to true guidance which requires proof.
Proof is by God's proof or otherwise there is no proof. There is but conjecture to what morality and goodness is.
But the fact we all know some morals, means not only do we know God exists, but we know God's proof exists and we know it, no matter how much we forget and deny it and ignore it.
I like to think I have pretty decent reading comprehension. I can generally follow lines of reasoning, syllogisms, and implications. I have no idea what on earth you're trying to say above. Especially the part that I bolded.
If there is no God, moral judgment is not recognizing proofs of guidance, it's deciding itself, the person, and that is not morality or guidance. That is desire, nothing but sheer desire.
