Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: May 14, 2024, 6:55 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Shroud of Turin more legit after research?
#29
RE: Shroud of Turin more legit after research?
I watched a video by william guy who tries to prove the shroud and he said that crucifiction was invented by persians and perfected by romans. He said at that time, no one wore those thorns on their heads other than Jesus, therefore it proves it was him, and that it couldn't have been a forgery as real blood was used which had some chemical balance demonstrating the person was suffering. He said a forger wouldn't have put blood into the shroud, and he said pollen was found there that is native to ancient palestine. The most recent carbon dating seemed to suggest it was from a time period from about 1000 years BC to 1000 years after, so the timeframe could be right.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_conti...0JBberCqw4

(34:53)

the bible also got the right amount of scars (372) which was counted on the shroud.

Does this prove it was real?
Reply



Messages In This Thread
RE: Shroud of Turin more legit after research? - by orthodox-man - April 9, 2018 at 12:11 am

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Bombardier Challenger 604 'totaled' after A380 wake turbulence event vorlon13 1 712 June 14, 2017 at 11:13 pm
Last Post: Thumpalumpacus
  Dr. Graham Phillips research on meditation Little Rik 3 952 June 12, 2016 at 6:15 am
Last Post: Lucanus
  Who the hell believes this is a legit study I ask? Mystical 6 1445 May 7, 2014 at 3:09 am
Last Post: Justtristo
  Research shows radiometric dating still reliable (again) orogenicman 7 3086 November 16, 2010 at 6:14 pm
Last Post: orogenicman



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)